Thank you for your interest and support.
Of course, we are always interested in expanding our contact base. We expect one day “Team Law” will be a name known by everyone. However, that kind of thing takes people doing what you are suggesting you are doing; which is, following the admonition found in Admin’s signature to every message posted on the forum: “Tell everybody about Team Law!”
Though we did turn down Channel 9 News (NBC) Anchor Ward Lucas’ offer to interview Governor Madsen, when we did, Ward asked: “Why?”
Gov. Madsen’s answer was simple: “Because you are too ignorant to give a reasonable interview.”
Ward responded: “So, how do I cure my ignorance if you won’t do an interview with me?”
This discussion was held outside of the place where Team Law was about to have a meeting. Gov. Madsen said, “Well, we are about to have a meeting here and if the people in attendance don’t mind we could focus the meeting on the history lesson you need to understand what’s going on around you, then we could provide you with that education in about two hours.”
Ward checked his watch and asked if his camera man would mind staying, they made a few phone calls and arranged to stay. We asked the group and they were happy to have the opportunity to hear the review. So, the meeting began and we provided Ward with a factual based review of the history of the United States of America and Corp. U.S. providing him with the actual documents and records that showed exactly what happened right up through the formation of the corporate state known as the “State of Colorado” and our discovery of the truth through Gov. Madsen’s election and seating in the original jurisdiction State’s governor’s seat. Ward was free to ask question all of the way through the history lesson and when it was through was amazed with the facts. He then asked if he could do the interview. We approved of the interview so long as we retained the copyright and the last right of refusal of any published material. He agreed so long as we acknowledged that his news station would retain the copyright as well. We agreed so long as that included our last right of refusal. The agreement was set and he did the interview. Thereafter, when NBC was about to air the show, Ward sent Team Law a copy of the story as it would be aired and we approved of its publication.
That was the only interview we ever handled that way and it was only handled that way because Ward Lucas was known for doing hatchet jobs on every so called patriot group he reviewed. The problem with those reports was not Ward’s reporting style it was his ignorance of the history of our nation and the nature of those bodies that most people consider governments.
We relate that story about that interview because outside of that event, we have always taken every interview offered; however, we never solicit interviews. So, interviews are only offered when people spread the word to their favorite broadcasters.
With that in mind, it sounds like you have made contact with several such broadcasting interviewers. We always welcome such opportunities; so, you can pass that word along—we welcome the opportunity.
We expect the reason our efforts seem correct to you is you have intensely studied law and history for the last 15 years. Though we also expect that in that process of study if you did not follow something similar to our Standard for Review
, the answers to the many questions that would have arisen through your course of study limited your ability to connect the dots. With Team Law’s help, we expect those dots are now coming together.
We recognize the three points of interest you acknowledged people want to know about; however, we address each of those points in a different way; accordingly:
- The only parties that pay property taxes are those that contract for the same. No one has ever been charged property tax for “land” (see Land 101 for the definition of land). Accordingly, we would ask anyone that believes they have been so charged to prove it. Thus, the reason people have such a desire to see “evidence” of such a thing is based upon their own lack of knowledge. Beyond that, Team Law is limited from providing any private information regarding any of its beneficiaries and or their relationships; which makes providing such evidence impossible. Still, it is quite a simple thing for people to learn how that works if they are Team Law beneficiaries. That level of educational support is limited to Team Law beneficiary support.
- The evidence of people obtaining land patent is found in any BLM office or through their online service. In the United States of America, land patents are virtually the only form of Title available. The simple fact remains; the land patent is the Title to virtually every parcel of land in the country. Thus, that evidence is a simple thing to find for anyone willing to look in those records.
- The only evidence necessary to see that the military will support the original jurisdiction government is our nations Constitutions and the oaths each member of the military takes. The key to that one is again; the people have to learn the law and then apply it.
That is what Team Law is all about: we help people learn how to learn the law and how to apply it.
What most people want when they claim they will do what is necessary when they get such evidences is just an excuse for continuing to do what they are already doing—that is nothing, when it comes to learning that which they are already required to do—learn the law.
They imagine that with such evidences they would feel the warm and fuzzy feelings that it is, Ok for them to do what is necessary. That imagination is something that will never help them.
The only way for the people of this nation (or anywhere else, for that matter) to save themselves from their current circumstances is they must take their current personal obligations and responsibilities seriously and learn the law and apply it. No people can ever be free without it; no nation can remain free without it—for a government of the people, for the people and by the people to work the people cannot remain ignorant—they must learn the law and apply it. There is no other way.
And, when they people take that responsibility seriously and do it; their freedom is inevitable—not by revolution but by simple application of the law.
Debunking the fallacies promoted by Sam Kennedy, and the like is easy. All you have to do is compare what they say to the simple facts and poof; their own words will hang them. You don’t have to delve too far into their myths to discover that fact.
Again, we do not like to focus on other’s work; thus, though we are from time to time aware that people like Sam Kennedy allege they accomplished things we did we prefer to let their myths be debunked by others, like you. Again, that is why we consistently tell people not to believe any third party regarding matters like law and history. Instead, we ask people to awaken to the necessity of doing your own research firsthand. That is the only way to know for yourself what the law is and what it says. Even then, if you don’t follow the Standard for Review
your chances of understanding the law are almost nil. You must understand it from its source.
You imply that we are almost unknown in “the community”; however, that is a simple matter to rectify if the people that do know about us start making it known that they want to hear from us in that “community”. Of course, that can also shake up the community. When Team Law was the new kid on the block (over 15 years ago), we were invited to several patriot and tax protestor events. You may have attended such an event/convention. Several speakers are asked to present material to the attendees. All of the speakers also have booths where they can sell their wares between presentations. The way it works is, a presenter stands up and tells their story and after their presentation, anyone that is interested goes over to their booth and buys things. The problem for the other presenters was that from the time our Trustee got up to talk, at every break thereafter the people crowd around our booth and don’t visit the other’s booths anymore after that presentation. Thus, though the promoters very much liked our work and even used our Trustee for keynote speeches and multiple presentations to highlight the conference (because that was what the people wanted to hear), the other presenters would not come to such events/conventions if we were going to be there; so, the invitations stopped coming.
The second half of such a problem is that when people hear what we have to say they recognize it debunks much of what they have heard elsewhere; so, they actually start doing what we say —that being— study the law and its history firsthand. When people begin to do that they learn to debunk the mythology for themselves and they are not so quickly swindled by predatory marketers.
Back in those days the internet was a brand new thing that most people knew nothing about. Thus, there were no such radio shows like those to which you referred. Again, we welcome the opportunity to participate in such interviews. We have even contemplated starting a regular radio broadcast of our own. We are open to entertain offers related to such an opportunity. One thing is for certain, whenever we have done radio and television broadcasts the ratings for that show go up.
You also indicated that you have found some broken links on our sites. However, we are not aware of any. We have the best professional internet development software in the business in house and we will check for broken links. However, even the best software can miss on that service. The problem with such software is it can show broken links where the links work quite well; thus, looking through the report system to find such links and repair them can be quite tedious. Thus, we also rely on people like you to keep us informed if any links go inactive for any reason. With you report (though non-specific), we ran the link checker and found a few potential problems. Those were corrected. We did not complete that work today so we will have to get back to it later. If you (or anyone) finds any part of our websites that have broken links, improper spelling or grammar (even in posts made by Admin), we always appreciate the input. All such errors or omissions are checked and corrected ASAP. So, thanks again for the input.
You are correct in noting the people “are being pulled in a 1000 different directions these days by various "leaders"”; however, alleging a need for “evidence of legitimacy” is implies that you do not understand what Team Law is and or what we do. The bottom line: we merely help people learn how to learn the law, its history and language, through which they learn how to apply the law. Thus, the only thing that could possibly interfere with that purpose and our function would be if the people actually already knew the law and if they were actually living in accord with it and applying it to control the government and all that it creates. Of course, that has not happened and is not happening. Instead the people are awakening to the knowledge that something is wrong and they are starting to look for answers. But that is the very thing that has created the hodgepodge of “leaders” that are swaying the people “to and fro by every wind of doctrine”— pulling them “in a 1000 different directions”. The remedy? Again, stop listening to third party presenters and start following the Standard for Review
to learn the law and apply it from your own firsthand experience and study of the law itself. Team Law can help. In fact, that is our primary function. We will not do your work for you; we simply help people learn how to do it for themselves.
We hope this information is helpful to you.
Tell everybody about Team Law!