Lou
You were correct in acknowledging that we already addressed the matter you requested on our
Patriot Mythology page. Those that attend such seminars and hear the people say they wanted to invite us to come as presenters to their seminars do find it interesting that we are not there. The reason we are not is we were not invited. We have no idea why such marketers say such things in their meetings, but as you noted those that do provide the attendants an opportunity to discover the truth, so we are thankful that they do; and, welcome. We hope you enjoy your journey discovering the truth from your own experience of studying the law with us.
Most people find what they learn here refreshing. Mostly we expect that is because we do not tell you how to think or how to learn what you must learn—the Law, its history and language. We do help you discover how to do that easily even though the body of law you must learn is immense.
Some people find themselves in such seminars because they have found themselves in a fix; where they realize something is going on in government that they do not understand and they are simply looking for help to understand it. The problem with that is that is exactly how we got into this situation in the first place—by listening to someone else we believed was not leading us astray.
The only real solution is we must recognize a simple reality. It comes from answering these three questions:
- If a law applies to you, do you need to know the law to comply with it?
- If you do not know the law, will your ignorance of it excuse you from compliance?
- Can you know the law by having someone else tell you what they think it is; or to “know” it do you have to learn it from your own actual experience of reading, studying and understanding it?
You see most people ask questions like yours; they hear something from someone and they want to know if it is true; so, rather than going to the source (the law itself) they turn to another third party source to make their inquiry. But, given the obvious and only outcome from those three questions (that being that
you must know the law for yourself
from your own study and understanding), the only possible way to know the truth is to look to the law itself.
So why do people so consistently look to the third party for this information? We believe it is because our common education system has incorrectly taught and convinced us that learning the law is so difficult that we have no hope of doing that in the limited time we have.
Now, though it is a bit hard for us to get used to, that is what we think people find so refreshing about Team Law, especially after they work with us for a while. We help them find their way through the law so they can learn it firsthand. From what you find looking at the materials we have published, you can see an obvious difference between Team Law and every other organization. You can easily prove what we have presented and we give hope that you can learn what you do not yet know.
Regardless of why you honored us with your inquiry and though you asked us to provide you with our opinion regarding a matter we already resolved on our
Patriot Mythology page, there is a new term the
Strawman Theologians have raised that we did not yet discuss in those articles debunking myths— secured party status. Accordingly, here is our response:
As Vzeng1 noted, you would be well suited to at least run an errand of learning and review our
Contracts, Trusts and the Corporation Sole article beginning with its presentation of our
Standard for Review. Then when you finish with that (to really get an idea of what is going on), read
Myth 22. With the learning you will acquire through that study, you should already be able to resolve your inquiry on your own.
But we will not leave you with that. Let us look at this new term a bit closer (and that is why we sent you on the errand of learning, so you would have a proper foundation). “Secured party status”, nice term. So what does it mean? Who is this, “secured party”? And, we must ask, “Secured from whom or what?
We have to assume from your inquiry that you are the party designed for this “secured status”. Of course, if you followed the
Standard for Review you will already realize that your status was permanently secured to you by your Creator and there is nothing you can do about that—you are “sovereign”. (see
Myth 6)
When people are reminded of
Myth 6, they often think something like, “Well it doesn’t feel like I’m sovereign.” Of course, that is because you were not yet inspired to study the law and apply it. Accordingly, you do not know how to act sovereign and it is not likely that you will until you start following your sovereign responsibility to learn and apply the law. There is no excuse. Procrastinate the sovereign responsibility to learn and apply the law long enough and you will get to make your excuses to your Creator as you account for what you did with the gift you were given.
You are simply sovereign, so get use to it. As noted, your sovereignty requires you to learn and apply the law.
The other side of that question was, “Secured from what?” We have to imagine that means secured from Corp. U.S.’ control and that specifically (considering the allegation from the marketers that you have to file a U.C.C. 1 Form) as it may apply to some debt; considering that the U.C.C. 1 Form is a Corp. State form designed for securing that privilege of collecting a debt within the Corp. State.
Of course, that raises new questions, “What debt?” and who are the contracting parties to this presupposed debt. Now, depending on whom you talk to, they address different debts and different creditors. The bottom line, they typically allege the man is the party to be secured as the creditor (or the one owed the debt) desiring to collect the debt and they are either alleging that the “Strawman” is the one that owes the debt or that Corp. U.S. is the one that borrowed the funds in the name of the Strawman , which they allege is attributed to the creditor. Either way, even if you put the reality that there is no Strawman and the party created by Corp. U.S. was in fact a trust (more commonly known as the “taxpayer”) the allegation that the so-called secured party is owed something makes no sense.
If the allegation is the trust owes the man something, then the trust should just distribute whatever that is to the man; considering the fact that the only person on the planet that has the lawful authority to control the trust is the one that lawfully lends the trust consciousness and physical capacity through the office of its Trustee—that is ultimately the man. Thus, filing a U.C.C. 1 Form would indicate that person is up to something odd or potentially fraud; thus, that filing should come under scrutiny for potential fraud.
If the allegation is Corp. U.S. created the national debt (or some other debt) against the trust (alleged
Strawman) and accordingly somehow now owes the man something, then there would actually have to be some such thing in existence that proves that obligation to the man and if there is not then that allegation constitutes fraud. Now at that point we cannot delve into that matter here as that level of support requires Team Law beneficiary support. Suffice it to say, there is no such debt in existence that can scale that wall. Thus, filing a U.C.C. 1 Form in that case would prove the person filing the form was involved in perpetrating a fraud involving a federal government agency. Thus, should any instrument, letter or other thing be delivered to any party using any common carrier (like the United States Postal Service, FedEx or UPS, etc) that would constitute mail fraud involving a federal person; the penalty for which is 30 yrs. in jail and a $1,000,000.00 fine, per violation.
Now, personally we think that is a bit of a stiff penalty for doing something you do not understand just because some idiot sold you a bill of goods in a seminar—but that is exactly our point. Don’t you think that doing something that someone else says to do without first knowing the law for yourself is a bit foolish?
Now, with that some people say, “But isn’t Team Law a third party to the law?”
“Yes!” That is exactly our point. That is also exactly why, Team Law is an educational organization that does not educate; rather we hope to inspire people to discover the absolute necessity of learning the law for themselves from their own firsthand experience. We can guide by helping you understand how to discover the truth and learn the law. It is actually quite an easy process when you follow the
Standard for Review.
Now, let us look and a couple of the other points you referenced in your inquiry:
“Appointing the treasury department as your fiduciary”; whoa! You have got to be kidding! Why would anyone ever want to do that? The mere thought of that would insanely motivate you to stand up and fight if it were someone else alleging that they were going to compel that against you. Why would anyone ever want to do that? It makes reason stare!
Why would anyone want to have such a thing as a “Birth Certificate bond”. Again, truly this is one of those things that can only become a thing in such a seminar where you are already convinced of what you are hearing. It is nonsensical.
“Submitting the offset bonds to the creditors to discharge the debt”, again this is on that path of the previously shown mail fraud against a federal agency—bad idea, no substance other than the document trail you fraudulently create!
The good news, you presented your inquiry underlined with the following comment:
Loujen213 wrote:I am concerned and do not want to put myself and family in a bad situation.
We hope our response is enlightening and helps you to realize; the only way to know what to do when making such decisions is to do what you are already required to do but obviously have not—Learn the law first hand and then lawfully apply it. You might remember that was one of the primary things the Founding Fathers noted. Governments fear nothing more than an educated populace that knows the law. That is the only way to restore our Constitutional Republic and to keep it.
Team Law can help—that is all we do.
We hope this information is helpful to you.
Tell everybody about Team Law!
