:h: Welcome
to Team Law’s Forum!

We hold a Conference Call every Monday, Wednesday & Friday morning; at: 8:00 AM (Mountain Time).

Our Conference Call number is: (857) 232-0158
Conference Code: 110045

While on the Conference Call:
To mute your phone: press: 4*
To raise you hand for a question or comment: press: 5*

Use this Forum to contact Team Law;
use this link for more: contact information.

In conjunction with our Success Network
We announced our participation in the
Self Made Man Contest
on our Facebook and Twitter pages.

What is the new Self Made Man platform?
It’s kinda like Netflix, but better.
The content and platform will help you change your life, and the world…

It launches: February 20th
And, to celebrate,
they’re giving away over
$35,000 in cash and prizes!

Click here to
Enter Now!!!

We hope this information is helpful to you.
Tell everybody about Team Law! :t^:

After reading this announcement, you may remove it by moving your cursor to the upper right corner of the announcement's green background and clicking the “X”.

Historical Outline question re: US Constiturion

Contracts, Trusts & the corporation sole; what they are & how they relate with one another.

Moderators: Tnias, Jus

Posts: 1
Joined: Thursday August 28th, 2014 4:47 pm MDT

Historical Outline question re: US Constiturion

Postby Martrw » Tuesday September 9th, 2014 7:10 pm MDT

Team Law,
I am in the process of applying the Standard for Review by validating all statments made in the Historical Outline. The 3rd paragraph states:

3rd: In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it was missing the national constitution’s 13th Amendment and the national constitution’s 14th, 15th and 16th amendments are respectively numbered 13th, 14th and 15th amendments in the Corp. U.S. Constitution. At this point take special notice and remember this Corp. U.S. method of adopting their own Constitution, they will add to it in the same manner in 1913.

I am unable to find any "adoption" statement in the The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871. I have read the document multiple times and have highlighted each occurance of the word Constitution and each reference, in my understanding, is to the Constitution of the United States. I looked for wording which may imply the adoption by use of artful language but have failed here also. Finally, I have searched the forum to see if the question has already been answered but am unable to locate any similar discussion.

Please help me to understand what I am missing. This crucial foundational issue has me baffled.

User avatar
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1585
Joined: Thursday June 9th, 2005 12:16 pm MDT

Re: Historical Outline question re: US Constiturion

Postby Admin » Friday October 3rd, 2014 4:03 pm MDT

:h: Martrw:
Due to the fact that our response to your inquiry would have taken quite a bit of typing (the most labor intensive and slowest form of communication we have), we used your inquiry as the basis for our morning Conference Call on, September 10, 2014; respectively, you will find our response there—just go to the Conference Call page and scroll down to the, September 10, 2014, recording.

We hope this information is helpful to you.
Tell everybody about Team Law! :t^:
Team Law,

"In memory of our God, our faith, and freedom,
and of our spouses, our children, and our peace.

As with all Forum posts, comments made by Admin are:
copyrighted—all rights reserved; and, provided here for educational purposes only.

Return to “Contracts, Trusts & the Corp. Sole”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest